In the name of Allah, al-Malik (the leader):
Jalal Talabani who has been elected to the iraqi presidency
for a second term of four years, the maximum of which is constitutionally
permitted, has held the office in excess of that which was legislated before
his incumbancy began, since the legal term was set to be expired April
2013. For more than the past year Jalal has been suffering complications
after a stroke, to the extent that Jalal has not been residing in the nation of
Iraq and has not been in the capacities that are required for the most
significant and energetically expensive office in the nation: The Office
of the Presidency. Yet for reasons of ignorance or incompentance, no
attention has been flagged upon this issue; especially to import regard of the
outright attack on the government and national security of Iraq. Unlike
in most nations of this planet, there are several independently organized and
armed and trained politically motivated bodies that operate in the country with
explicit oppositional aims toward the incumbent political factions of the Iraqi
government.
The duties which the incumbency of the president is obliged
to fulfill, are duties held up from the highest virtue of the nation.
Iraq is comprised of 32.58 million people, larger in manpower than the nation
of Saudi Arabia. There is a critical need for investigation into the
discharge of the duties of the president of the nation, to observe and review
performance, and to demonstrate a pressurized feedback system from each
division of the institutions powers up to the president. The president's
execution of official duties are crucial capacities in its agency of
functionally international theatre. By virtue of presidency, it is not
purposed for top-down pressure because the governing of nations is based on
constitution not on dictation. The virtue of the presidency is that it
consolidates the national interest into a practical mode for transfer of
information. The role which is officially defined as: guiding foreign
policy; consult with leaders of foreign countries; make decisions based for the
country on contributed information which affects foreign affairs; giving
speeches that evaluate the countries domestic and foreign policy; final review
of the legal and economic implications for bills passed through the congress/
parliament. The role is defined further to encompass the duty for:
taking advice and being informed on the needs of political party which must
reflect the political party agency for the citizens and the citizen's
supporting approval of political party programs; to coordinate the efforts of
oversight upon over one-hundred government departments or agencies of the
government, in the discharge of their independent duties.
An objective review on the state of iraq demonstrates the
criminal negligence of the adminstration, the obscentity of offense which is
exhibited in the support of Jalal to retain such an office. These are
acts of malice against not only the iraqi nation but against humanity because
this is a case of criminal negligence of duty which is explicitly bound with
The Office of the President of the sovereign nation. The acts of criminal
negligence which can be brought out of the instances that are yet to be
uncovered and published in a comprehensive public evaluation will be shown to
have internationally proliferated impacts and influences in negative
regard. These can be demonstrated as criminal negligence that are crimes
against Humanity itself, obviously. And this grade of obscenity in
international politics and this level of criminal negligence can and must be
prosecuted to the fullest gravity of the foundations of law.
All Praise Be To Allah!
Written Saturday July 19, 2014
For Moslems to act together as one Ummah, they must feel
connected to each other. The distances keeps Moslems disconnected from
the thoughts and feelings of brothers and sisters. And suspicion causes
Moslems the feeling of being disconnected from each other.
Vladimir Putin and his administration have an agenda, and
this has been transferred across administrations. Due to the law about
the terms of presidency in Russia.
Term length Six years (renewable once consecutively;
afterwards, the officeholder must sit out for one term before being eligible
again)
He has the ability to reclaim the powers of the office of the
presidency. And he may act in that capacity for an indefinitely longer
amount of time than an American president.
The Russians have generally opposed the involvement of the
united states of America with the rulers of middle eastern republics.
These are cases of ruling families or individual rulers who remain in power for
decades. The maximum number of terms that an American can serve as the president
is two, this equals up to eight years. This is a safeguard. And it
is protecting valuable principles that the nation has been extending to other
nations on behalf of it. America has a vest interest in the limits of
foreign people to act on behalf of the sovereignty of the nation in the
president’s office they are charged to.
Americans are concerned with the regard of the people toward
the president’s office as a representation of the sovereignty of the
nation. The Americans were happy to depose Saddam Hussein. They
were happy to trial Momar Gaddafi, and Hosni Murbarak. And in the case of
Mohammad Morsi, they agreed, but they saw the danger in the transition.
The American’s have asked Bashar al-Assad to step down. They have
invested in sustaining the opposition forces. American’s are in the
control and command center with exertion of a lot of power over Nouri
al-Maliki, despite that the Russian administration is threatening to change the
balance of that relationship, to the detriment of the future freedoms of the
Iraqi people. The American’s are responsible for the sanctions that have
devastated the administration of Bashar al-Assad and the economy of
Syria. The American’s will be asked by the international community
to be accountable toward the humanitarian crisis and therefore, more resolute
decisions will be forced into action. …………………………….
It is against the American federal law, the constitution and
it is illegal in the united nations that any country would support a government
transition that uses armed force with the intent to install Sharia Law.
That is because it is a human rights violation to compel religion. It is
against the Quran as well, and it is against the Charter at Medina which is the
only and primary valid model of Islamic Statehood.
If there is a lack of Feedback. Losing the
senses. About the situation. And negative feedback is necessary for
officials to admit. However, they are afraid of it. Because they
fear the negative feedback will reduce their power. To be realistic it is
necessary to accept negative feedback and take fair notice. إذا كان هناك نقص في التغذية المرتدة. فقدان الحواس. حول الحالة. وردود فعل سلبية ضروري للمسؤولين أن اعترف. ومع ذلك، أنهم خائفون منه. لأنهم يخشون من ردود فعل سلبية سوف يقلل من قوتها. أن تكون واقعية من الضروري قبول ردود فعل سلبية وأن تنتبه عادلة.
There is a Tendency of the
leaders in the nation to lose touch with reality.
There is a tendency of the leaders in the nation to lose
touch with reality. This is a simple matter of neurology. The
neurons are over-stimulated. Therefore, the leaders lose their fine
senses. This is why it is imperative to have disciplined education and
strong prohibition mechanisms in the high offices of the state.
One must use the example of the united states of America in
the review. Because they have proved to be one leading opinion which is admired
by many others who respect justice. There are strong prohibitive
mechanisms on the congressmen. There are grave inhibitory devices which
prevents the congress and the official’s and the officers to do evil
deeds.
Many of the leaders in the most recent era have displayed a
severe defection from the reality of their predicament. They have denied
the warnings and unheeded the signs of change. They curiously have been
exhibited to be Shameless about the Evil Deeds They Committed. They act
as though they still have integrity and so does their close followers.
But people should beware of them because they are concealing their insanity and
perversion.
There is a pattern of the deeds. A showing of the
consequences.
.1 Bashar’s fantasy that he will brutally oppress the
political dissident.
.2 Mohammad Morsi’s fantasy that he will tyrannize the
Egyptian people and compel them to Sharia. There was none of this in the
Charter at Medina.
.3 Nouri Maliki’s fantasy that he will attack protesters
groups and kill them and dispel all groups of dissidents.
.4 Viktor Yanukovych’s fantasy that he will kill protesters
and exploit perversely, oppressing officials and political movements.
.5 Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil el-Sisi that the crimes
of 800 people at once, in a political movement impassioned by the Egyptian
people will be met with death.
Each of the officials who does such Evil will be thrust into
ruin by the people of the nation. Because this is not the Era enjoyed by
Joseph Stalin. The oppression of Joseph Stalin is impossible to be
re-created, although there is definite signs that this is being attempted by
massive, powerful corporations of people for profit: Monsanto, and other
massive food industries. The oppression and evil of Adolf Hitler is
impossible to be re-created because the Geneva Charter was initiated in
reaction to that, in a vow to prevent ever a recurrence. Joseph Stalin
was in character a replica of the evil insanity of Saddam Hussein. The
character of paranoid schizophrenia: two different personalities.
One is always the violent and maniacal. The other personalities he acts
out are attempts to compensate for the over-stepping of the limits done in his
maniacal urges.
Maniacal- suggestive of/ afflicted with insanity.
The electoral power is a portion of the hijacking of the
nation’s sovereignty by a group and persons acting as official’s. And the
perception of the official-ness of the evil behavior of the official’s is a
persistent threat.
People must be able to perceive clearly the limits to
sovereign conduct.
People must be able to perceive clearly the limits to
official conduct.
